ailalogosepia.jpg (97582 bytes)

 

an ngo in consultative status with ecosoc 

american indian law alliance 
to hear the voices of our people, even unto the SEVENTH generation 

Border Crossing Rights

About Us

Why International Work 

Urban Indian

Our Own Voices

Legal Services Project

Pagans in the Promised Land

Documents & Reports 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

brochurecover.gif (15093 bytes)

for a copy of the text of Border Crossing Rights

click on the pdf format file link below

BORDER CROSSING RIGHTS

Between the United States and Canada for Indigenous Peoples

When the Europeans landed in North America, they encountered sovereign pre-existing nations who had their own citizens, territories, governments, and laws. In the beginning, the European settlers conducted their relations with America’s inhabitants mindful of their sovereign status....

At the end of the American Revolution, the United States was granted independence. Later,a boundary was fixed to separate America from the balance of the British territories in North America. The exact location of this border was an open dispute until 1794, when the United States and Britain entered into the Jay Treaty, an agreement between the two nations that provided free border crossing for United States citizens, British subjects, and most importantly “the Indians dwelling on either side of the boundary line” who were excused from taxation on their “own proper goods” as they crossed the border. While free border crossing has been traditionally granted, the United States has never provided the freedom from duties it promised in the Jay Treaty.

An even greater victory, and a substantial change in law, was secured through the activities of the Indian Defense League and a legal action led by Paul Diabo, a Kahnawake Mohawk. After these landmark efforts, Canadian-born individuals with a minimum of 50% Aboriginal blood were permitted to enter, live in, and work in the United States without restriction. Moreover, the United States will not deport these individuals for any reason.

Canada also has had a checkered history in terms of honoring its obligations to its Aboriginal Peoples, first disavowing them in the Francis case, and then largely restoring them through subsequent legislation. The current Canadian state of affairs suggests that Aboriginal people whose nations are divided by the U.S.-Canadian border can enter Canada as a matter of right. However, the Canadian government, like its American counterpart, has been less inclined to honor its Jay Treaty commitments to exempt Aboriginal Peoples from duties on things they bring across the border. Although the right to import items for personal or collective use has not been litigated, the Supreme Court of Canada has denied Aboriginal Peoples any exemption from the duties that normally attach to the importation of trade goods into Canada.

The political landscape concerning the rights of indigenous people continues to change.  The United Nations is currently debating declaration that would define the rights of indigenous people to include, “[T]he right to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual and material relationship with the lands, territories, waters and coastal seas and other resources which they have traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used, and to uphold their responsibilities to future generations in this regard.” And it would provide other groundbreaking protections for the better as well. For the worse, the United States openly opposes the adoption of the Declaration by the United Nations, while the Canadian government has gone from oppostion to support and back to opposition.  Such are the variances of the EuroAmerican democratic political model. 

In the meantime, both the United States and Canada have continued to update their border crossing laws. On this front, the most notable changes to immigration policy have followed in the wake of the September eleventh terrorist attacks. The U.S. government’s response has been to make its borders less porous, and correspondingly it has become more difficult to cross the U.S.-Canadian border in recent years.

The Border Crossing Rights handbook was originally researched and drafted by AILA legal interns in the summer of 2000 with the support of Montana Legal Services, North Dakota Legal Services, Pine Tree Legal Services, and the Indian Law Office of Wisconsin Judicare, who agreed to be listed as Legal Resources. In 2005-2006, the information was updated by Mark Billion,  a graduate of Columbia Law School.  Mr. Billion reviewed the information in light of changes in immigration law and tightening borders.  This booklet  is only for reference and is not intended to offer any legal advice. 

Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto became the bridge contact for input from the Ontario Metis Aboriginal Association, Nanavut Tunngavik, and Inuit Tapirisat of Canada, and the Canadian co-publisher and distributor of the handbook.

 As the handbook progressed, we sought input from members of our community.   Oren Lyons, Faithkeeper of the Onondaga Nation, John C. Mohawk, author, Director of the Program in Indigenous Studies at SUNY Buffalo and Co-Director of the Center for the Americas, Rick Hill, Manager of the Haudenosaunee Resource Center, Paul Williams, Esq., from Oshweken Ontario, Peter Jemison, Site Manager for Ganondagan State Historic Site, and Professor Robert Venables from Cornell University all made valuable clarifications and contributions, as did other community members who proofed our work.  An INS officer who is alert to Native issues at border crossing points kindly proofed information connected with INS regulations.  We are deeply grateful to all our gracious co-authors and helpers.

 AILA acknowledges that the requirements and restrictions set forth in the handbook are, strictly speaking, violations of the treaty and Native sovereignty. However, the purpose of the handbook is not to argue treaties and sovereignty (that battle is being waged in other forums).  The purpose of the handbook is to help members of our extended Indigenous community, wishing to travel, work and live on either side of the border, to successfully navigate the complications of applying the treaty under current circumstances.  We hope it will satisfy those purposes and aid legal practitioner's in meeting the needs of their clients.     

11 Broadway

Second Floor
New York, NY
10004

1.212.477.9100 phone

1.212.982.5346 fax

aila@ailanyc.org